• TootSweet@lemmy.worldMEnglish
    24·
    12 days ago

    Got a report on this post about the top left photo calling it a “nazi style jew caricature”. It appears the photo is real/legit. As in, it’s not an AI-generated image, it’s a photo, and it’s not edited to speak of, and it documents a real incident that really happened. Not that that specifically determines whether it’s antisemitic or not. Jews are human, and bigotry against humans is unacceptable. The question here in my mind is “is this image a dehumanizing representation of a Jewish person or does does image tell a story of a soldier heavily-armed settler committing atrocities?” And after the research I’ve done, I feel it leans pretty heavily toward the latter and I don’t think action is warranted in this case.

    • flying_sheep@lemmy.ml
      61·
      14 days ago

      If you read the article you linked: this isn’t a soldier.

      The real soldiers were there and supporting that guy though.

    • bthest@lemmy.worldEnglish
      3·
      13 days ago

      Gotta love the familiar backhanded tactic lying directly to mods and admins (hoping they’ll be ignorant dumbasses) about something being anti-semetic; while never bringing the accusation to the thread because they know that it would be ripped to shreds in a second.

    • BigDiction@lemmy.world
      11·
      13 days ago

      Not a soldier of the Israeli military, but a misguided frontiersman yokel, y’all queda douchebag on a mission “blessed by God”.

      • bthest@lemmy.worldEnglish
        2·
        11 days ago

        So when something happens to these lovely people, the Israelis get to call them innocent civilians. He carries a weapon, wears a uniform, has a side; he’s a combatant, perfectly legitimate target.

        • BigDiction@lemmy.world
          1·
          10 days ago

          I prefer to keep the traditional enlisted with orders distinction to not blur the lines. For similar reasons that smuggling cocaine in a boat does not make you a valid military target.

  • lechekaflan@lemmy.world
    3·
    15 days ago

    That one there. Those promptbros and their fanbases not stopping to constantly produce the latest shiny cheesecake with the maximum possible dimensions.

      • JcbAzPx@lemmy.worldEnglish
        3·
        14 days ago

        The biggest difference is qanon actually believed that politicians running a pedophile ring was a bad thing. They were just misinformed as to who was running it.

        They’re the part of maga that bailed when the first Trump/Epstein files dropped.

        • destructdisc@lemmy.worldOP
          4·
          14 days ago

          Actually yeah, you’re not wrong. The guy in the photo has since come out in opposition to Trump and Israel, so that’s quite something

          • JcbAzPx@lemmy.worldEnglish
            1·
            13 days ago

            The ironic thing is that the Q they were all listening to originally was likely Epstein himself bragging on 4chan.

  • Dr. Moose@lemmy.worldEnglish
    12·
    13 days ago

    Ah yes some kids making harmless pictures is the same as political oppresors. You guys are so fucking cringe.

  • Fart Armpit@lemmy.world
    23·
    14 days ago

    All i can say “magats” is a nice wordplay. Like combination of maga & rats, but at the same time it reads like “maggots”. And maggots can be interpreted as removeds kremlin puppet parasite worms poisoning soil (land and it’s inhabitants). Whoever came up with “magats” pun is clever enough 😁 P. S. Yes, it was that f-gg-word, which displays as “removed’s” 🌚