Artist Jingna Zhang built Cara, a platform explicitly intended to protect artists from having their art stolen by AI…and yet these people just won’t leave them well enough alone.

Source thread

  • stingpie@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    19
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Recently I’ve been embedding metadata into pictures I upload which include the cost to license out the image for AI training: 1 million dollars. Then, if an AI company scrapes my picture, I can take that company to court and have a concrete dollar amount for how much that company owes me for damages.

    • Xandrash@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Its a bit delusional to think you can sue them. For a number of reasons, not least of which is that you don’t have the funds for a protracted legal battle and that the burden of proof that your work was used is pretty much impossible to prove.

      • stingpie@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        I don’t think so. First of all, if a lawyer thinks that I have a strong case, they could agree to be paid after I win, so I don’t need to pay out of pocket up front. Second, it is easy to prove that an AI company used my pictures, since they would need to download the pictures to train on them. Alternatively, if a platform sells it to the AI company, there is a record that it was sold for the purposes of AI training.(In that case, we don’t have to prove that the image was used for training, since the crime is the sale.) Lastly, since the license and purchase info is contained within the metadata of the picture, they can’t argue that the license was unavailable or something. They have it right there in their servers!

        • QuandaleDingle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          5 days ago

          I’m not a lawyer, but as an artist, bravo. You’ve changed how I look at this. No sarcasm here. 👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾👏🏾

      • Squizzy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        5 days ago

        Its art, the artist is saying if you want it you have to pay x amount and they are taking it so the presumption is that they both know the value put on it by the artist and decided to use it.