I just tried the glass of wine filled to the brim, and unfortunately, it was able to do it. When I buy something used online, I like to ask for an image with something that ai cant do, so I can be sure the offer is real. Any ideas? There must be something that it still can’t do…

  • Doom@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Just ask them to hand write a sentence of your choosing on a piece of paper and put it in the photo. Even if AI manages to produce a “handwritten” sentence it’ll likely look too perfect and stock.

  • _Nemo_@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    4
    ·
    9 days ago

    A hand-drawn picture of Elon, his shrivelled, tiny excuse of a dick in hand. AI will refuse to render something like that because it involves

    • nudity (all common models) or
    • an accurate depiction of Elon (Grok)

    The downside is: humans might refuse to “render” something like that as well…

    • DeeBeeDouble@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      No, I just asked them to place a full glass of wine in front of the object I wanted to buy. As AI couldn’t do that, I could at least be sure they’d actually have the product.

      • SpaceNoodle@lemmy.worldM
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        8 days ago

        Why would you want to see a full glass of wine in front of another full glass of wine? Is it ful glasses of wine all the way down?

  • T156@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    8 days ago

    You might be hard-pressed to find something a human can make, but an AI cannot. (It also doesn’t preclude an old-fashioned scam).

    An AI would struggle with something like depicting the melancholia of having your partner die to a wasting disease, and when they do die, their estranged family comes in, taking almost everything you had in you shared apartment while you’re helpless to stop them, because your relationship isn’t legally recognised.

    But so would a human. It’s not impossible, mind, but 'twould certainly be difficult. Something abstract may work, like that piece, but I can’t imagine most people would think of that off the bat.

    What about going the other way? Ask for something that an AI can do easily, but a human can’t.

    • DeeBeeDouble@lemmy.worldOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      9 days ago

      Woah, that’s a good one, the first try failed! Will look into it more.

      Edit: Oh well, it nailed it on the second attempt. Too bad…

      • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        9 days ago

        I honestly just think of LLMs as dementia patients, so that’s why I went in that direction. Maybe try other dementia tests (though obviously if a person with dementia is trying to assert their personhood, it won’t be effective).

        I think that’s probably all kinds of offensive, and the only real defense for it is, ironically, heuristics. I don’t mean to offend, and my impression is probably based on my first hand experience of ADHD/pothead/CPTSD cognitive/memory issues and secondhand experience living with my grandmother for nearly a decade after her Alzheimer’s diagnosis. I’ve seen both of us do things that seem like they’re based on dream logic or autopilot, and they seem to be similar to LLM hallucinations.

        For me, it feels like my subconscious mind knows the sorts of things I do and carries them out without any conscious direction or awareness, meaning they don’t always make sense. Doing my hair before putting on a pullover top or washing and drying my hands before washing dishes are common examples from my daily life. My grandmother used to get a long stream of logical steps from an illogical starting point, like thinking her great uncle (who died in 1952) was trying to surprise her by taking her to the fair, so she needed to get dressed up and pack snacks and a camera, and anyone suggesting it wasn’t happening was in on the surprise.