• Stupendous@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    15
    ·
    9 days ago

    It’s like that era of putting pink ribbons on everything for breast cancer that also signaled you were a supporter of women. Commercialized activism. Be real. This will sell very little. We’ll get some news articles about how it’s trending with Gen z that are rejecting technology and always online culture. It’ll actually only be a small amount of Gen z but you know blogspam going to blogspam.

    It’s a crappy product. We need a Linux phone that would actually be a halo product for people to not feel like they’re ripping themselves off to get away from Google and Apple

  • Moonrise2473@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    Browser and email is the bare minimum, though.

    Even the cheapest clamshells in the 2000s had those two.

    Don’t preinstall it by default if you want to look minimal but being forced to sideload (their app store blocks this essential category???) an Android APK in the emulator instead of using native Linux apps for that, is ridiculous

    I understand that for a small company like them (it’s being owned by a YouTuber now) creating hardware is extremely expensive and 499 can even considered cheap with all the custom stuff in this device, plastic molds, dedicated assembly lines and so on, but my mind can’t accept paying more than 149 for something like this

  • thingsiplay@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    12
    ·
    9 days ago

    My first thought was, this might be about just what’s installed by default. Reading a bit further the article says:

    Apparently, the OS has hard blocks to stop the installation of browsers and social media apps.

    “Users are still able to sideload apps outside those that are blocked, using APK installer files…”

    So I’m not sure why I would want pay 500 Dollars / Euros, just so they have control over what I can install and not. To me this would be a deal breaker. Also this seems to be “basically a custom version of the Jolla Sailfish OS”, so there are probably “better” options using the same OS. And it only has 4GB of RAM? I am not impressed for the price and for the control.

  • utopiah@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    9 days ago

    So happy with my 2nd hand Pixel 8. No BS, ecologically acceptable IMHO and yes runs most Android apps thanks to GrapheneOS.

  • Snapz@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    9 days ago

    At $200… Maybe.

    AI slop video, no faith in what will (or likely won’t) be delivered.

  • Geodes & Gems@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    That’s a stupid price, one of the main things of brick/flip phones is their low price, HMD feature phones range from about £20 to £70, some new google pixels can go for about this price, so getting something with the price of a smartphone with a fraction of the features sounds scummy.

  • DupaCycki@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    5
    ·
    8 days ago

    Who is going to pay $500 for a retro flip phone, when you can get a second-hand iPhone for half that? Or you know, an actual flip phone for $25.

  • AndrewZabar@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    9 days ago

    This is a joke or satire, no? Who the F would pay that much for a flip phone. You can get them for free can’t you?

  • foremanguy@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    8 days ago

    How could this idea come to mind… Surely that’s great, but who in the team said “Give me a price! 500!! Approved!”