10 through 18 look like the bristolstool chart
- 0 Posts
- 14 Comments
I struggle in my own head on such things. I think it is ridiculous to shame anyone for such things. But I personally dislike armpit hair on a women. Of course I also don’t like it much on me either. But I hate the feeling when it is stubble, and before that it chaffs. So I just trim it down pretty short. Maybe that wouldn’t bother me on the ladies either. But probably would. I think the light dark contrast is what is unappealing to me. But nobody asked. Your welcome.
Modern_medicine_isnt@lemmy.worldto
Lemmy Shitpost@lemmy.world•Its a circus and we're the clowns
8·19 days agoAnd often, the places with all the hoops are terrible places to work. Because guess what, they make you jump through hoops to do your job, and everything else.
Cooperation against other humans (and Neanderthals and such)
Hm, the percent of drug dealers and mobsters that don’t have an active combat like role is very very low. But the military has people like doctors and nurses among other very much non combat roles. So it isn’t really a fair comparison. And some people join the military to avoid becoming a drug dealer or mobster. It’s a step up, mostly because it is legal. And for some, they do one tour and then become productive members of society. That happens far less with drug dealers and mobsters. So at least give them the respect for choosing not to become a drug dealer or mobster.
I know the nuance will be hard for some. So I will start by saying that I am very against the actions of our government, and have been since a pretty young.
But, the vast majority of our troops are in the military because it was the best or maybe only option to make a living. And that is the way the government design the economy. They make sure people have no or few other choices.
Now compare what the military is doing to distract from the epstien files to what the billionaire class is doing. Then look at who you work for. Odds are your job in some way supports the very people who made epstien possible. So we are all complicit. Yet we all have little choice but to work. So instead of pointing your anger at someone who just like you is complicit. Point it at the people actually responsible.
See that would be great. But it actually causes division between people who agree that the genocidal fucks should be dragged out int the street and … but don’t agree to jumping to conclusions or over generalizations.
The actual supporters of genecidal fucks aren’t here to be divisive against.
Sure, except no one got offended. Though I guess I didn’t read the most recent responses. So maybe someone did, but I kinda doubt it.
Actually, the votes prove my point.
I’m not saying it’s divisive to say fuck nazis. But calling someone you know almost nothing about a nazi seems a bit extreme. Mostly because the level of willing misinterpretation on here is stupid high. I could say fuck trump, and somehow there will be people who will call me a trump supporter. It boggles the mind.
I read that quote in mom’s voice in my head. Kinda like “don’t swear honey, it makes you look uncivilized.” Then I wondered, is there a civilized way to call someone a nazi?
The real question is… is the poster trying to drive engagement, or division.


There was Moana. :)