For Euros whiteness wasn’t and isn’t a consistent and sufficient category for white supremacists, they still drew and draw racialized dividing lines on ethnic and nationalist grounds, generally as a false consciousness that scapegoats race for social challenges created by their political and economic systems. Hating an ethnic German was and is not incompatible with being a white supremacist and having nothing against Swedes, for example. Racial categories are not scientific or even consistent, they just need to serve a purpose for the dominant social powers, and that purpose is usually either (1) the creation of an external enemy that must be dominated or dispossessed (justifying war and occupation) or (2) to create a “deserving” underclass that can be mistreated, underpaid, and kept precarious, and blamed for the ills faced by other oppressed (but less oppressed) people, particularly workers. The development of capitalism over 500-700 years is rife with the creation of these categories in order to slowly proletarianize the male population and (mostly) enslave the census population, plus justify racialized slavery in colonies.
It would not make much sense for Jewish Holocaust survivors to simply hate white people. This is because they were also white per racial categories in those parts of Europe. But whiteness was a lesser category than ethnonational categories at the time. Polish Jew, Lithuanian, Ukrainian, Slovak, German, these were categories in use. These categories were often relatively new and created through the emergence of nation states, serving a purpose for the now dominant economic and political system.
It would not even fully make sense for a Jewish person to simply hate Germans. Many were German, considered themselves such. It was the Jewish-excluding Germans that excluded Jews, not the other way around. Same for Polish Jews, etc. This is prevailing opinion as well, because Jews were and are not monolithic, they had differing cultures, languages, norms across Europe. It is Israeli ethnonationalism that has attempted to crush these differences and basically invent a language (modem Israeli Hebrew) to kill off the variety of languages spoken by Ashkenazi Jews (and other Jews), trying to make Judaism into a monolith whose sole representative is a genocidal settler colonial ethnostate.
But even if it did make some level of sense for Jewish Holocaust survivors to blame a single racial category (that of their oppressors), historically it is unlikely that they would have. The oppressed do not have as much need for ethnic hatred. Ethnic hatred is a tool for the oppressor to justify their crimes. The oppressed, experiencing a form of liberation, tend to just seek basic justice and equity.
Right, sure, the point is just even if a Jew does hate Germans after the Holocaust it simply doesn’t have the political character of nazi antisemitism.
Sorry, I don’t really see the connection between this article and the discussion here, or rather, how it would say that they’d be the same. In my mind rather the opposite. Good read though.
One does not wish, in short, to be told by an American Jew that his suffering is as great as the
American Negro’s suffering. It isn’t, and one knows that it isn’t from the very tone in which he
assures you that it is.
If Palestinians would hate Jews (using the term antisemitism here feels a bit out of place since Palestinians are the Semites) there wouldn’t somehow be a new Holocaust.
It would just be comparable to white-people hate by Africans. Or Algerians hating French people. Or… Jews hating Germans.
Of course. The primary difference being oppressor vs. oppressed. Same as how in the US white supremacy just isn’t the same as a black person that’s sick of white people.
Though I do want to emphasize that it’s a trope by and for the oppressor to speculate about how they have to keep oppressing or else the oppressed will get revenge. There’s a very limited rhetorical toolbox for liberal ethnic supremacists and it hasn’t changed much in 400 years.
For Euros whiteness wasn’t and isn’t a consistent and sufficient category for white supremacists, they still drew and draw racialized dividing lines on ethnic and nationalist grounds, generally as a false consciousness that scapegoats race for social challenges created by their political and economic systems. Hating an ethnic German was and is not incompatible with being a white supremacist and having nothing against Swedes, for example. Racial categories are not scientific or even consistent, they just need to serve a purpose for the dominant social powers, and that purpose is usually either (1) the creation of an external enemy that must be dominated or dispossessed (justifying war and occupation) or (2) to create a “deserving” underclass that can be mistreated, underpaid, and kept precarious, and blamed for the ills faced by other oppressed (but less oppressed) people, particularly workers. The development of capitalism over 500-700 years is rife with the creation of these categories in order to slowly proletarianize the male population and (mostly) enslave the census population, plus justify racialized slavery in colonies.
It would not make much sense for Jewish Holocaust survivors to simply hate white people. This is because they were also white per racial categories in those parts of Europe. But whiteness was a lesser category than ethnonational categories at the time. Polish Jew, Lithuanian, Ukrainian, Slovak, German, these were categories in use. These categories were often relatively new and created through the emergence of nation states, serving a purpose for the now dominant economic and political system.
It would not even fully make sense for a Jewish person to simply hate Germans. Many were German, considered themselves such. It was the Jewish-excluding Germans that excluded Jews, not the other way around. Same for Polish Jews, etc. This is prevailing opinion as well, because Jews were and are not monolithic, they had differing cultures, languages, norms across Europe. It is Israeli ethnonationalism that has attempted to crush these differences and basically invent a language (modem Israeli Hebrew) to kill off the variety of languages spoken by Ashkenazi Jews (and other Jews), trying to make Judaism into a monolith whose sole representative is a genocidal settler colonial ethnostate.
But even if it did make some level of sense for Jewish Holocaust survivors to blame a single racial category (that of their oppressors), historically it is unlikely that they would have. The oppressed do not have as much need for ethnic hatred. Ethnic hatred is a tool for the oppressor to justify their crimes. The oppressed, experiencing a form of liberation, tend to just seek basic justice and equity.
Right, sure, the point is just even if a Jew does hate Germans after the Holocaust it simply doesn’t have the political character of nazi antisemitism.
No it’s exactly the same.
https://nykolami.org/wp-content/uploads/sites/26/2017/12/James-Baldwin-Article.pdf
Sorry, I don’t really see the connection between this article and the discussion here, or rather, how it would say that they’d be the same. In my mind rather the opposite. Good read though.
The point is that it’s not 1940 anymore and Jews are no longer oppressed. In fact they’re a very privileged minority nowadays.
Or as James Baldwin said 70 years ago:
If Palestinians would hate Jews (using the term antisemitism here feels a bit out of place since Palestinians are the Semites) there wouldn’t somehow be a new Holocaust.
It would just be comparable to white-people hate by Africans. Or Algerians hating French people. Or… Jews hating Germans.
I’m really not sure where we’re miscommunicating here, maybe you missed my “doesn’t”? As far as I can tell I’m arguing the exact same thing you are.
My bad then I’ve probably misread your first comment.
No it’s probably my fault for writing unclearly :)
Of course. The primary difference being oppressor vs. oppressed. Same as how in the US white supremacy just isn’t the same as a black person that’s sick of white people.
Though I do want to emphasize that it’s a trope by and for the oppressor to speculate about how they have to keep oppressing or else the oppressed will get revenge. There’s a very limited rhetorical toolbox for liberal ethnic supremacists and it hasn’t changed much in 400 years.
Totally agree.