• porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    2
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Right, sure, the point is just even if a Jew does hate Germans after the Holocaust it simply doesn’t have the political character of nazi antisemitism.

      • porous_grey_matter@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        20 hours ago

        Sorry, I don’t really see the connection between this article and the discussion here, or rather, how it would say that they’d be the same. In my mind rather the opposite. Good read though.

        • geneva_convenience@lemmy.mlOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          12 hours ago

          The point is that it’s not 1940 anymore and Jews are no longer oppressed. In fact they’re a very privileged minority nowadays.

          Or as James Baldwin said 70 years ago:

          One does not wish, in short, to be told by an American Jew that his suffering is as great as the American Negro’s suffering. It isn’t, and one knows that it isn’t from the very tone in which he assures you that it is.

          If Palestinians would hate Jews (using the term antisemitism here feels a bit out of place since Palestinians are the Semites) there wouldn’t somehow be a new Holocaust.

          It would just be comparable to white-people hate by Africans. Or Algerians hating French people. Or… Jews hating Germans.

    • TheOubliette@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      22 hours ago

      Of course. The primary difference being oppressor vs. oppressed. Same as how in the US white supremacy just isn’t the same as a black person that’s sick of white people.

      Though I do want to emphasize that it’s a trope by and for the oppressor to speculate about how they have to keep oppressing or else the oppressed will get revenge. There’s a very limited rhetorical toolbox for liberal ethnic supremacists and it hasn’t changed much in 400 years.