Canadian men are terrible at taking pictures of their dicks
It really is rude to compose shots so poorly.
It’s like they’ve never bothered to learn to crank that F-stop while increasing the exposure to get that shallow depth of field. It gives an illusion of depth.
I like to use a 60mm prime lens on an MFT to give it a crop-factor equivalent of 120mm.
And go with a snooted strobe to get that shadow detail. Ring flashes are lazy and have no character.
See, I get you’re joking, but I’m not clear if it’s because you’re a hobbyist who saw an opportunity to info dump a bit for hyperbole, or if you’re using that hyperbole to suggest that it is an unrealistic expectation for dick pics to look sexy in any way possible (rather than just a dimly lit, unclear shot of someone’s unmaintained and unwashed patchy pubes and greasy dick)
It really is rude to compose shots so poorly.
It’s like they’ve never bothered to learn to crank that F-stop while increasing the exposure to get that shallow depth of field. It gives an illusion of depth.
I like to use a 60mm prime lens on an MFT to give it a crop-factor equivalent of 120mm.
And go with a snooted strobe to get that shadow detail. Ring flashes are lazy and have no character.
See, I get you’re joking, but I’m not clear if it’s because you’re a hobbyist who saw an opportunity to info dump a bit for hyperbole, or if you’re using that hyperbole to suggest that it is an unrealistic expectation for dick pics to look sexy in any way possible (rather than just a dimly lit, unclear shot of someone’s unmaintained and unwashed patchy pubes and greasy dick)
The real joke for the shutterbugs was the 60mm lens on the micro four-thirds camera.
It’s for macro photography. Sample (safe) picture from the lens using the end of a ballpoint pen:
Yeah, clearly not a lot of photographers in here.