That looks like their plan indeed, but on a technological foundation level it is completely impossible, which is partly what lead me to my hypothesis.
A word guessing machine no matter how advanced can’t acquire intelligence (nor can it gain consciousness, the the father of AI disagrees with me there).
It would really be good if this community started enforcing proper sourcing for these type of claims. That photo looks like a properly designed red cloth for this bull pen, I’m sure it will get lots of votes though.
“One of the biggest pump ‘n dump schemes of airline stock portfolios in the early part of the century.”
We all want the strate to reopen, but there’s already a wanker in charge of that.
I don’t know why you even posted this in the first place. There’s a “perfect” graph inside the article you could have screenshotted and used instead.
Saved hundreds of people frustration and more data center pollution. Who needs ai slop when humans can be this sloppy.
But you did expose the mob here will upvote anything even if the OP is of piss poor quality.
I don’t think you can prevent this from being posted, though I agree that resource should be available. It’s just that our attention spans have evaporated, everything must be instant and with LLMs it’s only accelerating.
This is about having a brief second of critical thinking and then not upvote or downvote the low effort post and upvote the first critical thinking comment.
Another thing on Lemmy is that we have half a dozen “users” who don’t care about the content, they just automatically post high engagement content from other platforms and post it here (without declaring themselves as a bot account too). And the mindless scrollers (at least 60-70%) going by this post, just take the bait.
Not having karma didn’t help much in hindsight.
Meanwhile on Lemmy: 3 downvotes.
I’m getting too old for this
Free advertising by inept journalists.
Report them. These are most likely reddit scraping bot accounts that don’t declare themselves as bot accounts.
And the award for most drunk parents at birthday goes to…
(Probably just the mum, as we can guess what his dad what up to.)
it doesn’t matter. the principle is that if x is the length of your context window, then at 0.4x the chance of hallucinations start increasing exponentially. we’re now at token windows of 1M, and all it does is shift that hallucination window further away, so the model ‘feels’ stronger because it takes longer before it hallucinates, but eventually it always does.
By the end of long workflows
Yes, this has been known for 10 years.
I don’t think it’s garbage. It’s highly effective use of technology to get a message across to the exact target audience they have.
Getting pretty tired of anything CGI being labeled AI slop. If you watched cartoons, an MCU movie or have done anything on a computer with graphics, you might as well call that AI slop too.
I prefer to reserve AI slop for people who offload their creativity to LLMs, which is not what these guys did.
Of all the collapse modelling, I’m sure the one that takes out internet to the masses will create a testosterone bomb no armed military police will be a match for.