• Zerush@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    arrow-down
    9
    ·
    6 days ago

    You can’t fight against capitalism with violence, this cause only more violence and suffering. Because the elite has all the force and weapons, apart to turn with it the oligarchs in martyrs, justifying more oppression. You can use votes, demonstrations, strikes. boycotts, sabotage. education and intelligence to fight the system, using it’s flaws against it.

    • BrainInABox@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      6 days ago

      “You can’t possibly fight the system, the elites have all the force and weapons! They’ll probably let you vote them out though idk…”

    • Dessalines@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      You can’t fight against capitalism with violence,

      Historically the only way you can fight against capitalism is with violence. There has never been a case in its entire ~400 year history where its relinquished power to socialist alternatives without violence.

      Fidel on this

    • Peacepath@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      6 days ago

      You can only fight capitalism using violence. This cause non-violent acts are turned into merchandises. The profits made on red t-shirt with Che Guevara’s picture are profits. Votes, demonstrations, strikes only have value if they come with a demonstration of capacity of violence.

      Which right was given by the imperialists without a fight or their fear of a fight?

      Even social democrates use this. They make the richests affraid of a communist revolution to make them accept to give back a little bit of that they have stolen to workers. But they don’t do that to reduce violence, they try to balance the threats to make their living out of them.

      Violence to force imperialists to renounce to their priviledges is unavoidable. The level of violence it will needs only depends on them. And they can’t coexist with a non-violent society, since their way of living is to exploit others (which is a constant violence).

  • RiverRock@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    25
    ·
    8 days ago

    “Sure the game is rigged and the stack of bottles is glued together, but we just have to throw the ball really hard.”

  • Lydia_K@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    22
    ·
    8 days ago

    Ah yes, more “don’t bother voting” propaganda.

    The message should be “you need to do more than just vote”

    • m532@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Do radlibs have a MLM scheme where they get commission for getting people to vote for their cult leaders?

      (I mean that would explain why they’re so desparate that they even try to shill voting to their worst enemies, the anti-imperialists)

      • kreskin@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        2
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        the opposite. Checks are written when the rich and genociders get the voters to vote like they want. By comparison, No one gets paid when we all choose to do the decent thing instead.

        • m532@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          6
          ·
          6 days ago

          Why would they pay off the voters when they can just pay off the lawmakers? Way cheaper.

    • BanMeFromPosting@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      12
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Not voting for genocide does more good than any amount of volunteer work within the democratic party could ever do.

    • eldavi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      13
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      8 days ago

      Ah yes, more “don’t bother voting” propaganda.

      the heart of the issue seems to be the legitimacy that voting gives to a system – participate if you chose do, just do so w the awareness of the fact your participation was more beneficial to the status quo than it was to you.

      and, yes, you do need to do more than just vote; but if you lack an understanding of why your increased participate is now necessary you’ll be treading water at best – like the democrats.

      there have been people who’ve been in this situation before and wrote down what they did with the benefit hindsight included – if you look at their stuff you’ll find out what you need to do beyond voting.

        • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          13
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          8 days ago

          If you hear “voting for the polite fascists is not really better than voting for the loud ones” and take that as “don’t even bother trying”, then you really may as well not bother trying, bcs nothing you were trying was ever going to help, and most of it will just strengthen the fascists.

          • Lydia_K@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            4
            arrow-down
            14
            ·
            8 days ago

            Please point to the part of the meme / title that encouraged voting for anyone let alone anything else. This is just disenpowerment and pushes the narrative that it’s hopeless to try anything at all under the guise of “liberals bad” (which I don’t necessarily disagree with, but this is training people to give up entirely)

            • DudleyMason@lemmy.ml
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              9
              ·
              7 days ago

              So you really did hear “voting for the polite fascists is not really better than voting for the loud ones” and take that as “don’t even bother trying”.

              You, specifically, should absolutely give up and don’t bother trying.

    • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      8
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      8 days ago

      If you actually thought this the only time you would give this response is when voting was actually occurring.