Copy image? Nope, here’s the link instead.

  • Zangoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    53
    arrow-down
    6
    ·
    edit-2
    11 days ago

    Why are we sending someone to “Extra Hell” for making an improved image format that has better compression and is an overall improvement over all 3 of the existing formats it replaces (jpeg, png, gif)?

    Shouldn’t this apply to everyone the companies who refused to adopt it, thus breaking every normal image workflow? (Same thing can be said about JXL)

    Edit: fix vague wording

    • theunknownmuncher@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      43
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      11 days ago

      Because they have a poor user experience with an OS and applications that have chosen not to support it properly, and blame the image format for this

    • 666dollarfootlong@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      11 days ago

      I’d say the knowledge about webp’s benefits is not mainstream at all, I learned about it last week from a random YouTube video. So when people download a file that isn’t working as expected they don’t know who to be mad at so they make memes like this.

      • Caveman@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        Obviously be mad at whoever responded to a request without accept webp in it with a webp or didn’t provide an alternative. Nothing wrong with supporting webp with a fallback

    • ms.lane@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      10 days ago

      It’s not an improvement over PNG.

      but it has an optional lossless mode that no one uses

      No one uses it and even if they did, you’d never know since there isn’t a .webl or .webpl to differentiate lossless.

      You know a PNG in lossless, you know a jpg is lossy. webp should just be assumed lossy 100% of the time.

  • mlg@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    26
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    webp will always be funny to me because it was made exclusively by Google to reduce lossy file size for faster HTTP transfer, but then when JPEGXL was released with better lossy compression and the ability to load graphical data progressively by quality instead of line by line bitstream, Google switched to AVIF instead and doubled down on even more lossy compression because they just want to save cloud costs and don’t care about image quality.

      • Unlearned9545@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        10 days ago

        I weep for the web server that has to serve those size images. I can typically cut webserver bandwidth in half by converting all non svg images to webp. Have had one project where this cut the network fee by 80% and allowed us to downgrade the rented server space.

  • nullspace@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    6
    ·
    10 days ago

    I agree with the comic. Saving a webp as an actually useful file format is an extra annoying step.

    • daannii@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      10 days ago

      Half the time it works. Half the time it doesn’t. Idk what the determining factor is but I’ve just got in the habit of doing screenshots. Which I then still have to open another program to paste and save.

      What even was the reason for this awful file type ?

  • Dagnet@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    11 days ago

    Use it with FoundryVTT all the time, its great for reducing size without losing much quality.