• mlg@lemmy.world
    cake
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    19
    ·
    30 days ago

    Lol that thread is a cesspool but I’m glad in classic lemmy fashion, its not shadow banned or locked.

    I don’t want to add more fuel to the flames but it’s a case example of why I don’t take the EU seriously when it comes to free speech laws or claims of “secularity”.

    France and UK were out here blocking Bosnia from arming itself during the genocide carried out by Serbia because they didn’t want a muslim country to exist in Europe.

    feddit banned luigi and pro gaza content because it’s apparently illegal to discuss those topics in Germany, as if an internet forum talking about foreign news needs to be regulated by the government.

    It’s not as bad as reddit, but there are some seriously god awful comments on that post trying to justify poorly disguised ethnic filtering laws.

  • Jankatarch@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    16
    ·
    30 days ago

    It’s like making it illegal for women to wear makeup and thinking you are “freeing them of cultural values originating from patriarchy.”

    I personally would like governments to NOT force a specific gender to look a specific way.

  • electric_nan@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    29 days ago

    If you’re one of those people super against hijab, do a say, duckduckgo image search for “women in headscarves”. You will see many cultures represented. They aren’t all Muslim, even. Which ones are ‘bad’ and which ‘good’? Would you also ban Orthodox Christians/Jews, or Hindu women from covering their hair? Rasta women?

  • GalacticGrapefruit@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    29 days ago

    A Turkish acquaintance of mine from a long time ago introduced me to the idea of reform Islam. I didn’t know that it existed, but she was a practitioner. She didn’t wear a hijab, she swore when she felt like it, and she wore shorts when it was hot outside. Her prayers were usually sitting quietly and humming to herself when her phone alarm went off. Whenever we did an art project, she’d do this big long prayer to dedicate it.

    Nice girl. Hope she’s doing okay.

    • Grapho@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      18
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      29 days ago

      Idk how it’s so difficult for westerners to understand that not all Muslims who consider themselves practicing Muslims observe all parts of the faith. There’s so many Catholics who disregard lent, hardly anybody listens to the dietary restrictions, there’s almost none who acknowledge Jesus’ teachings on wealth. Do all Catholics choose not to use condoms? Do all of them have the same opinion on abortion?

      But I do realize it’s part of looking at the out-group as a monolith at best and a hive mind at worst.

      • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.mlOP
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        10
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        29 days ago

        I think a lot of the reddit type atheists are so far removed from religion in general they only view religious people as a cartoonishly idealized strawman that has no thoughts other than what their book says and their preacher teaches, who every second of every day is thinking only about god and how to be more godly and who believes the simplest interpretation of their religion. I have encountered it quite a few times as well since my username “outs” me as christian.

        It’s that plus for muslims the sheer racism that makes for a particularly potent mixture of arrogance and ignorance resulting in this weird “white savior thats sneering at their lessers” postings

      • chronotron@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        5
        ·
        29 days ago

        it’s perfectly fine to judge the members of a group that follows a set of texts by what those texts say

        • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.mlOP
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          9
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          29 days ago

          Because there only ever is one interpretation of any text and religious people famously all agree on it.

          Because everyone who professes to a given religion has access to, reads and observes the texts and definitely doesn’t just go with whatever everyone else is doing and saying and getting their religious belief through osmosis.

          Because different sects and cultures don’t weigh some parts heavier than others and local cultural practices and superstitions play no role in how people observe or ignore the text.

          Because the text is the only thing that defines a religion and there is nothing else to it.

          And of course because you definitely understand the text by just skimming it until you find whatever verse lets you feel euphoric through enlightenment by your own intelligence.

  • geneva_convenience@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    edit-2
    29 days ago

    Type anything negative about Israel and the entire comment section is people saying how this doesn’t representat Judaism even when nobody mentioned it

    But type something negative about Muslims and all the Reddit Athesists get in line to dunk on them and explain how evil they are. Gleefully discussing about publicly discriminating their clothing.

    https://tariqacknickulous.substack.com/p/arabs-and-muslims-the-real-victims

    Noam Chomsky highlighted this shift through his own experience as an American Jew, noting that by the 1950s antisemitism in the U.S. had been pushed underground, and Jews were gradually integrated into elite institutions. In its place emerged a new “legitimate” racism: anti-Arab and anti-Muslim bias. Unlike antisemitism, which by the late 20th century had to be hidden, hostility toward Arabs and Muslims could be expressed openly in films, books, politics, and policy:

    “Antisemitism is no longer a legitimate form of racism. Anti-Arab bias, is a legitimate form of racism, meaning you don’t have to hide it. In most forms of racism you have to pretend you’re not a racist, so you have to pretend ‘I’m not antisemitic, I’m not anti-Black.’ You may be, but you don’t advertise it. Anti-Arab racism, you’re allowed to advertise. This was way before September 11 […] you see it in films, in books, in attitudes, it’s just not even hidden. Nobody will come out and say, ‘I’m an anti-Arab racist,’ but it’s everywhere, and every Muslim or Arab in the country knows it.

      • AntiOutsideAktion@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        11
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        29 days ago

        Conservatives don’t need their consent manufactured to go bomb people. This is for liberals. This is to make them believe that they need to save people by bombing them.

        • macaw_dean_settle@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          29 days ago

          No, I have never needed this. Your boogieman, “the liberal” is made up. I don’t know where you got this idea from.

        • fxdave@lemmy.ml
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          7
          ·
          29 days ago

          You are having an imaginary enemy that you call as “liberals” which is the cause of all bad things. You can hate liberals, but please first know what does it mean to be liberal. Liberal means liberalism like, or somebody liking liberalism. Which is associated with capitalism.

          You are not using the right word. It’s like saying you hate dogs because they fly above you and shit on your clothes. That’s the wrong animal. It’s just dumb.

  • Mulligrubs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    11
    arrow-down
    5
    ·
    29 days ago

    This is goofy. Not one of us can wear whatever we want in USA (and many other countries). All sorts of rules on dress.

    Dress codes for restaurants (jackets and ties required)… dress codes for schools (uniforms)… dress codes for jobs (uniforms)… dress codes for gas stations (no shirts, no shoes, no service)… dress codes for banks (can’t cover your face or wear sunglasses)…

    This is a false issue, used to inflame the dumbest among us. Sadly, it still works.

  • mortemtyrannis@lemmy.mlBanned from community
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    7
    ·
    30 days ago

    The whole idea of wearing a piece of clothing for some god is cringe as fuck.

  • Aeri@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    26 days ago

    My ultimate answer is that I feel internally conflicted and don’t know what to think anymore.

    I don’t like when oppressive governments are bad to women. But I’m not super worldly so…

          • AlHouthi4President@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            6
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            30 days ago

            @Jabril@hexbear.net

            Something I notice about all these spaces. When I post facts about Islamic resistance, instead of people asking something “wow thats actually incredible, do you know how they did this incredible thing?” We end up stuck in a pattern of having literally the same conversations trying to explain basic concepts.

            I know that I’m impressed when I see these statistics. Maybe thats because hijab made me stupid and oppressed 🤪 🫠

    • mathemachristian[he]@lemmy.mlOP
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      20
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      1 month ago

      This is framing of women in western clothing as more progressive vs women in hijab/chador is incredibly racist. It relies on Islamophobic stereotypes that play Islam as a less advanced civilization when compared to the rest. Please do not forget that the Iranian revolution that got rid of the shah was an internal, peoples revolution against a hostile empires marionette. The ayatollah was the synthesis of contradictions inherent to Iranian society and depicting current Iranian society as regressive compared to the Iranian society under the shah is effectively saying that westerners “know better” what the Iranian people need than the Iranian people themselves. This is racist. Whatever point you want to make against theocracy is lost in all the racist baggage that comes with the image.

    • ghost_laptop@lemmy.mlM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      1 month ago

      Two pics mean nothing bro, do you think there are not women like in the picture above currently? And if that were the case, what do you think it happened in Iran during the '70’s that caused this “issue” when it comes to religion? ahh, yeah, it’s always the us empire.

      • Zerush@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        arrow-down
        14
        ·
        1 month ago

        It don’t change anything, in any case is there a difference if a woman has the chois to wear a jihab or is forced to wear one.