• Pennomi@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    2
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    9 days ago

    Good idea, it depends on the implementation though - sometimes having a browser on demand is important.

          • Chee_Koala@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Just googled to see if I was misremembering because I definitely browsed the regular web on my Nokia N73. It also came out in 2006, and back in the day it was not called a smartphone.

            I would say your statement is factually incorrect.

            • Hawke@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              9 days ago

              I’ll say I’m correct on a technicality. 2006 is not “long before smartphones” only a year or so. The N73 is a sort of proto-smartphone, even if the term wasn’t in use yet.

    • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      9 days ago

      How do you think people managed before smart phones?

      Nothing’s that important it can’t wait to get home or to a library, or call someone and get them to check if it is THAT important.

      • YexingTudou@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        9 days ago

        Not impossible to get by, but a lot more difficult in the modern world. I used a dumb phone for a little while a few years ago and I just ended up carrying a smartphone w/o a SIM to tether when needed bc of how much infrastructure assumes you have a smartphone nowadays (in the US at least). It’s infuriating - not impossible, but a lot more difficult than it used to be.

      • Pennomi@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        9 days ago

        I’m not saying it’s unmanageable, I’m saying it’s useful to have one.

        A web browser is not the problem in most people’s cases, social media is. The point of a dumb smartphone is to keep all the useful tools while banning the harmful ones.

        • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          3
          ·
          9 days ago

          No, if people can receive emails, it defeats the entire purpose. Just don’t install those apps then? Lol. A browser allows access to most social media anyways, so providing one is counter to its purpose.

          • Pennomi@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            9 days ago

            Strongly disagree. Email is foundational communication just like text messaging.

            Social media is NOT foundational communication.

            • SchmidtGenetics@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              9 days ago

              And an email can wait until you get home, if it’s that important, call, but texts suffice.

              A browser allows access to social media, so now you just lost the phones sole purpose, good job.