Single party consent for recording in public (or in places a person could be reasonably expected to be recorded) is the norm everywhere I’m aware of.

A private conversation would be one where you could claim that a person is expected to read a privacy policy to people but of course that would be preempted by the recording party following actual laws governing recording and would never be expected.

Call it what you want. Military detention sounds worse than kidnapping to me and that’s what the idf describes it as so that’s what I say.

I also do not believe the effectiveness of the flotillas will be in their quantity of delivered aid or successful landings, however I see the value of raising the Red Cross/Crescent and sailing towards a war zone with the declared intent and cargo in preparation to disperse aid to force the idf to stop you.

That action (and it is action) makes clear to any observer that the intent of the zionists is genocide.

I’m not familiar with the person you’re posting about but military detention by the idf is not the same as being arrested and I’m not sure what you can possibly be trying to accomplish rhetorically by equating the two.

People should send nude pictures to people who take action against the Zionist ethnostate.

What’s the problem here?

Idk about that either. In the real or the abstract.

I think right now the companies that host the services demonetize people and if I remember right the responsibility for content is a part of the communications decency act in the us. There’s an ongoing fight on weather to get rid of the section that gives immunity to the carrier of a message intended to originally make bell telephone not responsible for when you yell slurs at someone through the receiver.

One interpretation of that section is that the platform isn’t responsible for the content on it and they like it that way and tbh that’s why they demonetize people because it gives them the chance to avoid people interpreting it the other way, that platforms are responsible for the content on them which would be all well and good except for the fact that it would apply to cox cable and l3 and everyone who carried your hypothetical slur ridden twitter post to the twitter server and also to you for wickedly using tls to obfuscate your hateful language from those innocent companies and usher us into ultimate surveillance hell world.

but none of what I wrote matters because the dead man and newspaper in the op are both on the island of England which is inhabited entirely by degenerates whomst the communications decency act doesn’t apply to.

Idk if it’s a reasonable thing to say that a newspaper reporting on a case of academic fraud is responsible for the death by suicide of the alleged perpetrator of that fraud…

Yes it is.

From Portuguese to English.

It really seems like replacing that with a higher rated name brand psu will resolve your problem. You’re running up against the maximum power the pcie slot is rated to deliver. Claimed wattage only tells part of the story. All that power for the card has to come through the 24 pin connector along with everything else.

If you wanna prove me wrong plug the motherboard/cpu/gpu into someone else’s higher rated power supply and show that it has the same behavior.

If there’s a computer shop near you they’ll probably do this test in front of you with one of their power supplies for a couple of bucks. If there’s a gamer friend they’ll do it for free to help you figure out the problem.

You don’t have enough power supply.