One can be socialist and critical of dynastic states
- 0 Posts
- 7 Comments
I’m still not sure I follow what group counts as liberal on different parts of Lemmy, but does liberal to you include e.g. democratic socialists? Social democrats? Non-revolutionary socialist orgs?
Or are liberals free-market small-state types?
It was not at all meant as a gotcha. Let me reformulate: “Which issues in particular are you referring to? The class struggle leads to a plethora of important societal issues to address, and I am interested in hearing some particular examples. One such example could be the issue of unionisation, which holds a great deal of nuance across political contexts around the world, and therefore is a particularly interesting microcosm of this topic.”
If I had known that my question would be understood as hostile, I would certainly have put in more time to clarify what I meant. I’m still not sure why my question is hostile?
Can we not discuss like adults?
As in whether it should be owned by the workers, or whether it can be seized through non-violent means?
Issues like what? Unionisation?


Indeed. But seriously, how does passing on leadership to their child for two generations in a row not give cause to super grave concern for all socialists?