Ukraine struck Russia’s largest oil refinery, located in the city of Omsk, on Monday, marking what its forces say was its furthest-ever drone attack in the war.

The Omsk facility, which processes about 21 million tons of oil a year, is in Western Siberia and about 1,700 miles from Ukrainian territory — roughly the distance between Los Angeles and Houston.

    • boywar3@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      6 days ago

      Well, they both might benefit from eachother’s expertise in fighting wildfires…

    • tacoplease@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Australia is a bad choice cause they’ve been low-key screwing up their country quite badly.

      • Ann Archy@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        6 days ago

        Their economy and social policies are great under Labor, it’s only when the grift fascists are in power that all the money goes to oligarchs.

      • ms.lane@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        7 days ago

        I replied to the wrong post somehow, this was supposed to be under the post of Trump saying Iceland should be under US control.

        It probably makes a bit more sense there (I also don’t think California should be under Australia’s control, it was just snark)

  • brucethemoose@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    I wonder if Ukraine got the idea from Iran?

    I don’t mean that as an accusation, but… well, Iran basically has the world economy’s throat. And I know Ukraine’s drones just got the capability, but Iran had to be a fantastic reminder of how fragile an oil economy is.

  • idiomaddict@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    1
    ·
    7 days ago

    TIL Siberia is way bigger than I expected. I knew it was big, but it looks like it’s more than half of Russian landmass. It can’t all be the climate I’m picturing, right? Like it borders Kazakhstan, so I figure at least part of it has to have hot summers

    • Kirp123@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      1
      ·
      7 days ago

      Siberia is actually 3/4ths of Russia’s landmass. The northern parts are taiga, which are giant uninterrupted forests. The shores of the Arctic Ocean are mostly tundra. In the southern parts the taiga gives way to steppes.

      In the northern parts the climate has warm but quite short summers and long cold winters. In the southern part, where most of the population lives, they have the same climate as southern Canada/New England just less humid. The Western parts are also covered by warm winds that originate from the Middle East and hence have higher temperatures than their more Eastern areas. For reference in Novosibirsk, which is the largest city the average yearly summer temperatures reach 25 degrees Celsius but temperatures can also spike to as high as 38 degrees.

      So yeah Siberia is not all some barren tundra as most people imagine.

      • Buddahriffic@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        0
        ·
        7 days ago

        Though is that comparison corrected for the projection? Texas is farther south than Siberia and with the usual projection used, you can only compare the sizes of things at the same latitude. It’s the same thing that makes Greenland look as big as Africa when it’s closer to the size of South Africa.