If a service claims GrapheneOS users are reportable for “past security concerns,” it suggests their verification logic relies on static device attributes or behavioral baselines that this OS explicitly removes. This highlights a fundamental incompatibility where privacy-hardened environments cannot meet the opaque, risk-based demands of many age-verification schemes without sacrificing their core security guarantees.
Graphene is going to be outlawed soon. Wouldnt doubt if Linux won’t be next in some places.
Thats a pretty substantial claim. Outlawed where?
anywhere were a substantial enough number of people start adopting it; if i had a farm, i’d bet on it.
I think people aren’t reading too well into this. I think this is a massive failure on Yoti’s side that will just discredit their trustworthiness and reliability. What’s the “authorities” (police I guess?) gonna do when they start receiving a bunch of random citizens reported that have NOTHING to be reported for? Eventually they’ll have to learn to just ignore Yoti’s reports…or at least take them rather…not seriously, to begin with.
